Questions and Criticisms of Gay Activism (3)

There are many reasons why people criticize gay activism. These reasons stem from different social systems, cultural beliefs and individual perspectives.

Objections are often based on religious and cultural values, moral and ethical concerns, and fear of social change, which can undermine established social structures or traditional norms. In the third part of this series, we continue with important criticisms of homosexual activists.

The imperialist system is also working on pedophilia, incest, zoophilia and robot sex;

The Global Elites use scientific research to justify their position on zoophilia and pedophilia, claiming that these are normal emotional tendencies. Just as they have accepted homosexuality, they have begun to acclimatize minds to it. In Europe, organizations such as ZETA and the Rene Giuon Association are campaigning for the legalization of zoophilia, which involves bestiality. Pedophilic practices have long been legal in Europe, including child modeling in advertising, fashion and show business. There is also a debate about whether pedophilia is a crime or a disease. If it is defined as a disease, it can be decriminalized. If it is seen as a sexual orientation, it can be protected under the banner of gender equality.

If we accept that the Global Elite legitimize sexual feelings and desires towards children and young adolescents under the guise of freedom, it is important to consider whether we accept this as normal. This can lead to the abuse of children, impair their mental health, cause trauma, undermine their self-esteem, and weaken their motivation to learn.

Allegations of homosexual organizations working with the prostitution mafia should be taken seriously.

Ertuğrul Tulpar, who used to be gay and is now the founder of an anti-gay rights group, says that gay organizations work with the prostitution industry. He says this is a crime and should be thoroughly investigated because it is not something to be taken lightly.

Criticism in terms of scientific objectivity:

LGBT people claim that homosexuality is innate and related to genetic and hormonal factors. However, scientific studies show that there are no significant genetic or hormonal differences between homosexual and heterosexual individuals. This emphasizes the importance of scientific objectivity and impartial evaluation of evidence. Labeling scientific findings as 'patriarchal science' or 'heterosexist science' can be a biased and bigoted approach. Therefore, these issues need to be re-evaluated in order to avoid bias and bigotry.

Criticism of LGBT from the Philosophy of Science:

Fields such as science, medicine, sociology, psychology and anthropology have become tools of imperialist powers, focusing on the destruction of ecological wealth, biodiversity and natural resources. Prejudiced attitudes towards issues such as ownership of our bodies and our rights are reflected in scientific responses. Psychiatry and psychology, like Operation "Shock and Awe", have been used to legitimize colonial aims.

The "despotism of science" is evident in processes such as scientific data collection, conclusion drawing, hypothesis formulation, objectivity and the application of scientific methodologies. Medicine and the social sciences are not innocent, but they should not be completely rejected. Psychological studies, far from being ideologically independent, have a political dimension.

It is difficult to address gender in the context of the research of scientists working under imperialist capitalist influences. The methods of scientific data collection and analysis, objectivity and methodologies used must also be subject to critical evaluation.

A Critique of the Politicization of the Current Paradigm of Psychiatric Science:

Today's psychiatric paradigms see homosexuality as a problem due to personal beliefs and political pressures rather than based on scientific data. This can be seen as a criticism of the politicization of a field that often treats homosexuality as a refuge rather than a serious issue. The current psychiatric paradigm, influenced by historical, sociological and political processes, reflects the views of those working in this field. These paradigms, which do not see homosexuality as a disease, are accepted as a refuge for homosexuality. This situation, which arises as a result of political pressure from those who govern the field of psychiatry, is ignored by these individuals and the same attitude is expected from their colleagues. Geneticists and psychiatrists are unable to discuss homosexuality as a disease or conduct research on it for fear of homophobic stigmatization.

A Critique on the Insufficiency of Scientific Evidence:

The debate on whether homosexuality is a disease is based on three main areas: politics, science and society. Science is based on evidence and does not take into account social demands, traditions or the wishes of civil society organizations. For example, the data on whether cannabis should be classified as a drug should be scientifically based and independent of political or ideological pressures.

While homosexuality is addressed as a political and legal issue in many countries, these activities are carried out within a social and cultural framework. Pro-homosexuality activists, experts and politicians argue that homosexuality is innate, citing the 1973 decision of the American Psychiatric Association that homosexuality is not a disease. However, if sociocultural and political factors influence and drive the scientific basis, the focus of the debate can shift to socio-cultural and political dimensions.

Pro-homosexuality groups claim that the APA and its DSM classification system is the correct source of scientific evidence. They point out that there are other classification systems and that it is important to consider the reliability and validity of the APA's system. However, in light of the available scientific evidence and official documents, the main issue is whether homosexuality should be recognized as a sexual orientation disorder or mental illness.

LGBT+ organizations, backed by global elites, are very successful in hiding these facts from the public.

VEDAT KAT

This article addresses critical issues that every individual who values human dignity and freedom should be aware of, while also addressing the "invincibility" of the global elites and their collaborators scattered around the world.but rather to expose the fact that they will never achieve their goals against humanity, such as the " Great Reset", unless humanity allows them to do so.

Guwuste.com
Arise and warn, Stop evil