Global Censorship Blackmail

Censorship is similar to the concept of doublethink in George Orwell's "1984"; it aims to fragment and control society.

As in Orwell's dystopia, censorship limits individuals' freedom of thought and has the ability to alter reality by shaping public perception. Therefore, understanding the effects and potential dangers of censorship on society is vital for individual and collective consciousness.

Today, efforts to normalize censorship seem to be designed to accustom people to a technocratic censorship system and to ensure their obedience and submission to it. This system, which monitors every step and punishes "wrong thinking", is often accepted as "natural" in society.

Censorship parallels the concept of doublethink described by George Orwell in his work "1984"; it is used to divide and control society.

The methods used in these controls can be as follows.

** Research and Publication Bans: By imposing publication bans, law enforcement and judicial bodies allow only information based on official sources, thereby preventing independent research and the flow of information. Such bans aim to restrict access to information and lead to one-sided information flows.

** Hate speech laws are designed to restrict expressions of hatred and discrimination in society. These laws can severely penalize derogatory statements against personal characteristics such as race, language, religion, gender and sexual orientation. However, due to their potential impact on freedom of expression, these regulations can be criticized as technocratic censorship. While legal measures against hate crimes are intended to protect social peace and individual rights, the breadth and manner of their application may be controversial in terms of maintaining the fine balance between freedom of expression and security.

** Social Credit Systems: Social Credit Systems can be used as censorship and control tools to direct the behavior of individuals. These practices, driven by mechanisms such as social and carbon credit scores, have the potential to lead to social segregation. Policies such as digital identities, social credit scores, carbon credits, central bank digital currencies and food restrictions can lead to a dystopian and technocratic society. Such systems can create discrimination and inequality between different segments of society.

Another method of censorship is to impose legal restrictions on freedom of expression.

It is based on the idea that these restrictions should aim to balance the right of individuals to express their opinions with the general interest of society. Here are some key points:

** Democracy and Freedom of Expression: Freedom of expression is vital in democratic societies for individuals to be able to express their views, beliefs and opinions.

** Grounds for Censorship Restrictions: Restrictions on freedom of expression may be imposed for reasons such as national security, public order, public health and public morality.

** Proportionality Test: A frequently used method to determine whether restrictions are justified is the proportionality test. This test assesses whether the restriction is appropriate for its purpose and whether it is unduly restrictive.

** Obligation-Based Approach: An alternative approach, proposed to address some of the weaknesses of the proportionality test, requires the state to demonstrate to the public its obligation to restrict an individual's freedom of expression on reasonable grounds.

We are moving towards a global normalization of censorship to make everyone submit to a technocratic censorship racket that spies on everyone and punishes "wrong thinkers" by detaining and blocking them and restricting their food rations, even if they have money in their bank accounts. But according to the global elite's value system, research in this direction is considered off-limits and dangerous for global censorship.

Let us illustrate some recent events that will accelerate this process a little more:

Following the stabbing death of a bishop in Sydney, Australia, Australian police are preventing the dissemination, sharing or reading of information from unofficial sources. However, rather than punishing homicide attacks, questioning narratives about attacks is considered 'dangerous'. In Canada, sharing theories and stories about such killings on social media is banned. The fact that the media in the United Kingdom's dependent states control what information is made public raises suspicions.

New hate crime laws have come into force in Scotland, which provide for up to seven years in prison for 'offensive' remarks against transgender people. The Scottish Parliament rejected a proposal to repeal these hate speech laws, which have led to the country being criticized internationally.

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence system designed to replicate mainstream talking points. However, the Canadian government has requested from Google all search histories related to content viewed on YouTube. While user privacy and data protection are protected by various laws, requests for access to such data have raised suspicions.

The Brazilian government banned Twitter/X for allegedly collecting user information, creating a social credit system, conducting banking transactions and engaging in censorship. Australia, on the other hand, announced that Twitter/X would be fined 750,000 Australian dollars per day if it failed to censor news about stabbings. However, there is a contradiction in that Twitter/X itself engages in censorship.

Germany's Interior Minister emphasized the need for continuous monitoring of donations to far-right extremist groups. Nigeria is in the process of launching a national ID program similar to the Bill Gates and United Nations-backed digital ID systems in Sierra Leone. In Kenya, the introduction of a carbon credit system will make it difficult for many to buy food.

Recent developments, along with increased censorship and technological control, have raised concerns about the inevitable transformation into a dystopian technocratic society where elements such as 15-minute cities, digital identities, social credit systems, carbon credits, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and food rations combine to create a dystopian technocratic society. However, public awareness of these issues is still insufficient and many people are unaware of the possible consequences of these developments.

Nowadays, many people are turning away from mainstream media and towards alternative media sources, which is strengthening a different stream of awareness in society. While the mainstream media often tries to protect its commercial interests through self-censorship and fear-mongering, independent media outlets and social media provide real news without any restrictions and ignoring issues that may cause discomfort.

Activists and non-profit organizations raise individuals' awareness and offer an alternative perspective by exposing psychological operations on society. At the same time, these organizations serve as a kind of litmus test against possible future technocratic censorship.

And we must never forget this;

The point of this article is never to create the perception that the Global Elite Demons who are organizing all this are invincible. On the contrary, as long as people are awake and working collectively to fight back, the enemy of the human generation, the Great Satan, the Global Collaborativeto show that the plans of the dick devils and their collaborators scattered all over the world are weak and can be easily thwarted along with their evil. And the beginning of this is to wake people up.

Nothing is hidden in heaven and earth, despite the secret plans of the Global Elite Demons to leave no stone unturned in order to realize their goal of the Great Reset by ensuring Global Monarchy, which they are trying to put into practice in order to turn people into slaves to serve them. Thank you for being curious, reading and realizing the revelation of yet another global " Great Reset" plan...

Guwuste.Com
Arise and warn! And stop the evil!
(Arise and wake up! Stop evil!)