Climategate Scandal and Climatologists

 

How are climate scientists, funded and bought by global elites, blocking real science?

 

The climate system is an interactive and complex structure that includes the atmosphere, land surfaces, snow and ice, oceans and other water bodies and living organisms. It evolves over time depending on its internal dynamics as well as changes in external factors. This evolution process may take more than a few centuries.

The United Nations drew attention to the dangers of global warming in the 1980s. By 2021, it is developing policies based on a projected 2.4°C temperature rise by 2100. However, independent climate scientists estimate that the expected temperature increase by the end of this century will be 1.4°C or less. It should not be forgotten that the 1°C temperature increase in the last 100 years has contributed to a 400 per cent increase in the global population, an increase in food production and a decrease in deaths caused by extreme weather events.

Independent climate scientists who oppose the United Nations' prediction of a 2.4°C rise in temperatures by 2100 are not only labelled “climate deniers” but also face allegations that they are funded by global oil companies.

Could it be that the claim that a warming climate is dangerous is the weakest point of the argument for Climate Crisis theory?

The United Nations Environment Programme predicted the dangers of increasing global warming in the 1980s. However, this limited perspective led to ineffective decisions on emission reductions. Understanding the decisions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) without considering all the data had negative consequences for science and policy-making. While the IPCC of the period was expected to support the UN's climate policies, an approach that excluded scientists with different views was adopted. In an effort to create a consensus, it was seen that opposing voices were silenced and vilified.

** Let us now look at how the world has suffered under the IPCC agenda;

While many countries around the world are struggling with difficulties, Global Elites and their collaborators are profiting from climate policies. International aid for poor countries is now conditional on reducing fossil fuel emissions. This means that funds earmarked for reducing chronic poverty, increasing resilience to extreme weather events and alleviating hunger are diverted to efforts to restrict fossil fuel use.

The global elites are not only providing aid, they are also turning the urgent financing needs of debt- and interest-burdened countries into an opportunity, imposing high interest rates as well as a condition to reduce fossil fuel emissions. Turkey may have to accept such onerous conditions in the future, as its economy has reached the point where it can roll over debt with higher interest rates.

** What is the Climategate scandal?

Until 2009, many climate scientists believed that it was right to support the IPCC. But the Climategate scandal in 2009 shook this belief. In the aftermath of Climategate, there has been a trend towards reassessing their views on climate change claims and conducting independent analyses.

In 2009, as a result of a cyber-attack on the internal network of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, thousands of e-mails and files were leaked to the internet and featured in national media. Although there was a global consensus on climate change at the time, the incident triggered debates on climate science and data transparency. The scandal was blamed for fuelling planned concerns of a ‘climate crisis’ due to emails containing allegations that scientists were manipulating data and exaggerating climate change evidence. This led to conflict among scientists over climate science and data transparency, and to influence in the media, public opinion and politics. In the wake of this scandal, the number of climate crisis sceptics has increased rapidly.

Since then, scientists have continued to recognise and explain that overconfident predictions based on inadequate climate models are not appropriate for policy decisions regarding the current energy system based on fossil fuels. The information presented to the public has been carefully edited to appear more alarming than it actually is, and the conclusions of the IPCC report seem to have been specifically chosen to support a favoured but unrealistic narrative. This leads to people on the street being confronted with exaggerated claims and becoming concerned.

As a result, we can say that this is how climate scientists and organisations funded or bought by global elites block real science...

While this article addresses critical issues that every individual who values the dignity and freedom of humanity should be aware of, it is not to create the illusion that the global elites and their collaborators scattered all over the world are ‘invincible’, but rather to expose the fact that they will never achieve their goals against humanity, such as the ‘Great Reset’, unless people allow them to do so. Not allowing them will be the beginning of bad news for them.

Guwuste.com
Get up! Warn! Stop evil!