Climate Activists Beware

The United Nations and its affiliates have found some remarkable findings in climate research and advise that it needs to be more vigilant about climate activists...

While the UN and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) do not use the term 'climate crisis' as an official term, the media and activists have adopted a more sensitive language on climate change with terms such as 'climate crisis', 'global warming' and 'climate emergency'.

Some researchers argue that these terms are a perception created by so-called climate activists and the media and have no scientific basis.Despite being described as "Earth's warmest month on record", they note that there are almost the same number of hot and cold regions as a decade ago.

The term "climate crisis" is often used by politicians and the media to emphasize the critical importance of zero carbon emissions. However, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change avoids describing this threat in the same language. The Panel's latest report, published in 2021, suggests that the media may have lost objectivity with phrases such as 'climate crisis', 'global warming' and 'climate emergency'. This may suggest that the perception of a "climate crisis" may not be based on solid scientific grounds, but rather created by climate activists and the media. On the other hand, despite the European Union's Climate Change Act 2021 and the European Parliament's declaration of a climate and environmental emergency in 2019, the term "climate crisis" is avoided.

The terms 'climate crisis', 'global warming' and 'climate emergency' are terms used by independent media and climate activists to raise awareness among the world's people. Although these terms are not included in official reports, they attract the attention of the public and have created an important awareness. It is obvious that the Global Elites are worried that this awareness will spread further. This should be enough for us to realize that we should give credit to real climate activists.

It should not be ignored that periods of rapid warming in the past were similar to the present.

Dansgaard-Oeschger events are climate fluctuations whose causes are not fully understood. Leaving aside the mistakes of climate science in the past, it is of great importance to investigate the relationship between future climate changes and human impacts. In the near future, the temperature increase in 2023 is expected to reach the peak of the 25th solar activity cycle. solar activity cycle peak, a strong El Nino event and the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'We will examine whether three important factors converge, such as the underwater volcanic eruption of Apai releasing large amounts of water vapor into the stratosphere.

The Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that the non-linear and chaotic nature of the climate system makes future climate predictions difficult. Therefore, it is more appropriate to use ensembles of model solutions to predict the likely states of the system. Although climate models such as the Atmosphere-Ocean Coupled General Circulation Models have been developed to understand future climate variables such as temperature and precipitation, the resolution of these models is limited by many parameters and complex algorithms. The Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity, which expresses the expected temperature increase with a doubling of CO2 concentrations, varies widely across different models. This has led to reduced expectations from climate models, despite years of development.

In 2017, many climate models were described as showing an extreme warming trend compared to observations and as being significantly inaccurate. These models are not considered to realistically reflect the climate changes of the last decade, questioning their ability to predict future climate changes and related policy decisions. There are criticisms that the models do not accurately understand climate processes, especially for factors such as the sun, clouds and volcanic activity. However, such criticisms are often suppressed or ignored.

Climate models use scenarios of future anthropogenic carbon emissions to understand the impacts of climate change. However, the rate of anthropogenic CO2 emissions has remained largely constant over the last six decades, leading reports to fail to warn of an anthropogenic climate crisis.

All emissions scenarios are referred to as "Shared Socioeconomic Pathways", reflecting fossil fuel-centered development. All reports emphasize that negative scenarios are unlikely to materialize, but that there may be extreme cases that need to be considered. They also warn that a new series of emission scenarios is planned that aim to produce deliberately misleading results, and that these results should be viewed with skepticism.

Whilethis article addresses critical issues that every individual who values human dignity and freedom should be aware of, it is not to create the illusion that the global elites and their collaborators around the world are "invincible". On the contrary, it is to expose the fact that they will never achieve their goals against humanity, such as the " Great Reset", unless people allow them to do so.

Guwuste.com
Stand up and warn, and stop the evil