Advice from the Global Elite: "No Meat!"

 

Non-climate crisis advocates want to include a reduction in meat consumption in the United Nations' plans for strategies to fight global hunger...

 

Activists and climate scientists funded by global elites argue that we are on the brink of a climate crisis and that the ‘fight against global hunger’ strategies of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) agri-food roadmap are not enough. These groups favour reducing meat consumption in high-income countries.

They also argue that transitioning to sustainable next-generation food systems and increasing the use of alternative protein sources are critical to tackling the ‘climate crisis’. Within the scope of efforts to regulate and limit food supply, it is argued that the reduction of cows by slaughter will reduce carbon emissions and will be effective in combating the effects of the climate crisis. According to FAO reports, agriculture, livestock and food systems are responsible for about 26 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions.

This makes it possible for long-term strategic plans to be developed and implemented by co-operating states and governments around the world to restrict the agriculture and livestock sectors, with the aim of reducing emissions and transforming agriculture and food systems in a sustainable manner.

With the publication of the full version of the report, it remains to be seen whether criticisms in the interests of globalists will be taken into account.

To elaborate on the report a little further, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), in its roadmap to end world hunger and keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius, proposes one hundred and twenty actions in ten areas, including livestock, agricultural products, fisheries, aquaculture and food loss and waste. However, there is growing concern that the focus on livestock farming may increase the likelihood of reducing the renewable animal population and increasing the proliferation of ultra-processed artificial meats, insect-based processed foods and artificial dairy products.

The Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) has also developed a roadmap for the wheat sector in Turkey. However, despite the hope that the results of the project will strengthen the sector, the gap between global food price increases and food inflation in Turkey is widening. This raises questions and doubts about the effectiveness and scope of the Food and Agriculture Organisation's strategy for Turkey and its potential damage.

** However, the developments give rise to the suspicion that there may be another purpose behind it.

In their criticism of the report, global elites and their collaborators argue that food systems should be improved through data-driven solutions and that data should play a central role in decision-making processes. They also state that technocrats should oppose data manipulation and misuse. However, there are still concerns about the reliability of the data they propose.

Against this backdrop, there is concern that in the run-up to next month's comprehensive report, FAO will respond to the self-interested criticisms of global elites and set out clear methods for implementing the proposed actions.

** So who are those who have these expectations?

Alternative sources of artificial and synthetic proteins, such as artificial meat, plant-based novel proteins, and microorganism-derived proteins, are at the centre of new investments that promise big gains in meeting global protein needs in a sustainable way. These innovative alternatives are attracting the attention of the Global Elite and their collaborators, who have established research centres spread across the globe and are eager to shape the nutritional solutions of the future.

** Of course, they will not stand idle until they realise them...

The number of cattle is planned to be reduced in order to downsize farms. Young cows will be excluded from this regulation as they contain less meat. The reduction will start with mature cows, which contain more meat. With this strategy, the amount of meat on the market will be reduced and beef prices will effectively rise. The revenue generated will be considerable. State subsidies will allow consumers to buy meat at an affordable price for a while, and the cost of these subsidies will be indirectly covered by the taxes paid by the population. Thus, there will be no reduction in the profits targeted by the global elite.

The focal point in this process will be the farmers. Incentives and subsidies will be provided by the state so that they do not suffer losses if they downsize their farms. After the farmers become dependent on these aids, incentives and aids will be terminated in the future. In this way, a single agricultural system will be created under the control of Global Elites.

** Will similar scenarios be realised in Turkey?

The answer to the question whether this scenario will be implemented in Turkey is quite clear; if the number of offices of the United Nations and its affiliated organisations increases, it will be possible to implement this scenario.

While this article deals with critical issues that every individual who values the dignity and freedom of humanity should be aware of, it is not to create the illusion that the global elites and their collaborators scattered all over the world are ‘invincible’, but rather to expose the fact that they will never achieve their goals against humanity, such as the ‘Great Reset’, unless people allow them to do so. Not allowing them will be the beginning of bad news for them.

SADI ÖZGÜL
Guwuste.com
Arise and warn! And stop the evil!