Questions and Criticisms of Gay Activism (2)

Criticisms of gay activism come from a variety of social systems, cultural beliefs and personal perspectives.

Objections are often based on religious and cultural values, moral and ethical concerns, and fears of social change that may undermine established social frameworks or challenge traditional norms.

In the second part of this series, we continue to address important criticisms of gay activists.

Changing terms that have negative connotations about homosexuality is political:

The medical community has deliberately changed the names of terms associated with homosexuality, such as AIDS, to legitimize homosexuality. This caused public fear and slowed the growth of the homosexual movement. In the early 1980s, the homosexual lobby pressured the medical community to change the name to AIDS.

Criticism of the denial of the right to treatment for homosexuals:

Gay associations and organizations often ostracize people seeking treatment and see them as traitors. They are hostile to psychologists and psychiatrists who treat homosexuals, fearing that leaving homosexuality may lead to them receiving financial support from the European Union. They also work with some sex therapists, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists and doctors who believe that attempts to treat homosexual orientation are unethical and interfere with individuals' right to treatment.

Despite the thousands of people who have successfully cured their homosexuality through various treatments and therapies, many are ignored by the gay rights movement. It is therefore the responsibility of disciplines such as psychology, social psychology, psychiatry, community psychiatry and sociology to distinguish between homosexual lifestyles and to continue to investigate the cause, nature and treatment of homosexuality. It is in line with the ethics of medicine and psychology to provide treatment to those who, by their free choice, wish to be free from homosexuality.

Let me be clear: the reductionist approach to homosexual suicide is wrong.

The statement "This is not a curable disease; you have to accept it" is immoral and disrespectful to homosexuals. It ignores their problems and causes them to suffer. Some homosexuals attempt suicide because of social pressure and bigoted refusal of treatment by mental health professionals. The reasons for suicide vary from individual to individual and it is unrealistic to reduce the problem to a heteronormative structure. There are dozens of reasons for homosexual suicides and it is not scientific to attribute them solely to social pressure. It is important to take into account the specific circumstances of each suicide attempt and the different attitudes towards homosexuality in liberal and tolerant EU countries.

It is clear that "gender equality" policies serve homosexuality.

There is no doubt that there has been a significant increase in the number of students identifying as gay, bisexual or transgender in the US, EU countries and Canada. This positive correlation between GE programs and the increase of LGBT+ individuals is clear. Kinsey's sexual orientation scale is used to manipulate society and promote acceptance of different sexual orientations.

Let us not lose sight of what is behind the declaration of homosexuality as a disease.

In violation of impartiality and objectivity, and under pressure and threats, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) decided to decriminalize homosexuality as a mental disorder. This decision was not the result of scientific research, but of the invasion of the APA convention by homosexual organizations, the taking of members hostage and media pressure. It marked the most extraordinary day in the history of the APA, which had been under threat since the Stonewall riots in 1969.

The protesters demanded that homosexuality be removed from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which classifies psychiatric disorders. They had been preparing for four years and had found important allies within the APA. The pressure, threats and backlash paid off: The seventh edition of the DSM removed homosexuality from the list of 'mental disorders'. This statement appeared in hundreds of studies and was repeated frequently in the media.

The vote on December 15, 1973 was a political act. Less than a third of registered APA members voted in favor of decriminalizing homosexuality. Some members later admitted that the decision was unscientific. They described it as a 'guerrilla demonstration' or a 'cultural guerrilla movement'. Scientific findings that homosexuals did not like were labeled 'patriarchal science' and 'heterosexist science'. A year later, they demanded a vote with all members present, but this was not allowed. Threatening letters were sent to those who would vote.

To understand the development of homosexuality we need to discuss the Alfred Kinsey report.

The Alfred Kinsey Report was a crucial moment in the development of homosexuality. It legitimized both the LGBT and pedophile movements. The Mattachine Society, founded in 1950, was one of the forerunners of the LGBT movement. It was led by Harry Hay, a pedophile and supporter of NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. In the US, the LGBT and pedophile movements joined forces in their struggle. Until 1993, the umbrella organization of the LGBT movement, the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA), included pedophile organizations like NAMBLA. However, US Senator Jesse Helms revealed that pedophile organizations were also under the umbrella of ILGA.

This raises the question of why homosexual organizations hide their links with pedophiles.

Our questions and criticisms on this issue will continue as a series of articles...

Vedat KAT

Guwuste.Com
Rise and warn! And stop the evil!!
(Get up and wake up! Stop the evil!)