Questions and Criticisms of Gay Activism (4)

 

There are many reasons why people criticize homosexual activism. These reasons stem from different social systems, cultural beliefs and individual perspectives...

 

Objections are often based on religious and cultural values, moral and ethical concerns, and fear of social change, which can undermine established social structures or traditional norms. In the fourth part of this series, we continue with important criticisms of gay activists.

 

A critique of hasty psychiatric diagnoses:

 

Homosexuality does not cause depression in young people; however, fears or obsessions about homosexuality can lead to various problems, such as personality, bipolar, obsessive, mood and impulse disorders. In order to understand the difficulties in young people's sexual identity development, it is important to carefully analyze their psychological and sociological situation.

 

Criticism from a social-psychological perspective:

 

It is a common misconception that young men and women form intimate and warm friendships by walking hand in hand or holding hands. These friendships are normal and not a sign of homosexuality. However, some homosexuals see these friendships as a sign of homosexuality, which can be misleading and dangerous. This approach can cause confusion and mistrust among children, as some homosexuals may not be realistic or honest about their beliefs. It is essential to accept and respect these friendships as normal.

 

A Critique of the Humiliation of Heteronormativity:

 

The continuation of a society, the healthy functioning of the division of labor and the survival of the state depend on the continuation and reproduction of the population. The way to ensure reproduction is heterosexual union. In fact, every nation-state has a heteronormative character. With the increase in homosexuality, which does not have a heteronormative character, societies are faced with a decrease in the number of marriages and children. There is no doubt that the prevalence of heterosexuality in a society is one of the most important guarantees for the continuation of that society.

 

Population: Criticisms from the Demographic Dimension:

 

Heterogeneity is crucial for reproduction. Every nation-state has a heteronormative character. Increasing homosexuality reduces marriages and children, making heterosexuality an important guarantee for the continuation of society.

 

Criticisms from the Biological Dimension:

 

It is a simple fact that 90% of the world is not homosexual. They owe their biological existence to heterosexuals, not homosexuals. The preservation of heterosexual relationships is crucial for human existence because it goes against natural selection. Homosexuality goes against the ability to produce new generations, which is essential for the survival of our species. It is therefore clear that adopting a child in a heterosexual relationship is essential for our species to remain on the stage of life.

 

Philosophical Criticisms:

 

Homosexuality is legitimized by the fact that individual preferences are inviolable and unlimited in personal decisions. But if moral boundaries derived from social evolution are dogmatized, will incest, human-animal/human-machine sexuality, pedophilia and child pornography be legitimate?

 

There is no doubt that trying to legitimize sexual preferences in terms of human dignity leads to social decay and chaos. As a famous Italian historian has noted, the collapse of the Roman Empire because of homosexuals is proof of this.

 

Criticisms from the Evolutionary Dimension: If we accept homosexuality as a global trend, we run the risk of reducing variations to a few breeding human species. This is a reality that societies may not yet be aware of.

 

A Critique of Ignoring the Social Effects of Individual Choices:

 

Individual choices in social activities can have both positive and negative externalities. When these behaviors conflict with social norms, they can pose a threat to people's lives. For example, raising children in a city where zoophilia or pedophilia is prevalent can be difficult because the norms produced by those who pioneer this activity may conflict with societal norms.

 

Who Determines Social Norms?

 

If we classify people's behavior as 'good' and 'bad', what is 'normal'? Who decides what is good or bad? For a bank robber this action may be good, but for others it is bad. In this case, what is the basis of our concept of crime? For example, what makes rape bad? According to what norms and by whom are acts such as murder, theft, sexual offenses, etc. considered crimes? If morality is determined by voting, will the morality of murderers be good and that of victims bad when the number of armed people increases? From a broader perspective: Should there be norms in the social order? If so, by whom and how should these norms be determined? If the answer is no, what model can be proposed for a life without norms? These problems will never be solved without the adoption and dissemination of universal moral principles. Can the world really be safe if global capital determines norms, rules and values?

 

Social, Cultural and Legal Criticisms:

 

Health professionals are required to obtain informed consent when intervening with a person in order to minimize information asymmetry and protect their autonomy. However, the propaganda of homosexuality and efforts to transform sexual behavior in society constitute an intervention in the structure of society. This symmetry of information is often violated by presenting the consequences of the intervention, such as the transformation of children and social networks, and possible harms or threats. This information bombardment is carried out in a fraudulent, immoral and unprincipled manner, disregarding transparency and honesty.

 

The manipulation of this symmetry of information is a fraudulent, immoral and unprincipled method aimed at imposing homosexual propaganda on society without proper debate or consent.

 

VEDAT KAT

 

This article addresses critical issues that every individual who values human dignity and freedom should be aware of, while also addressing the "invincibility" of the global elites and their collaborators scattered around the world.but rather to expose the fact that they will never achieve their goals against humanity, such as the " Great Reset", unless humanity allows them to do so.

 

Guwuste.com
Arise and warn, and put a stop to evil

 

Do not forget to share if you like our article...