Under Attack by the Occupation Army

 

Stray stray dogs is an invasion army operation, which was projected 20 years ago and enlarged step by step to make Turkey uninhabitable and to make Anatolian lands Turkless and Islamless by making Turkey uninhabitable with global elites behind it.

 

Theprocess of establishing this army of occupation is as follows: Law No. 5199 on the Protection of Animals came into force in 2004, at a time when issues such as the United States of America, the European Union and the Greater Middle East Project were on the agenda. This law strengthened the protection of stray dogs, putting them on a legally equal footing with humans. The aim of the law was not to ensure that animals live comfortably and are treated well, or to protect them from pain and suffering, but rather to put animals in a position superior to humans in the legal and social sphere. This is understood from its effects in the process from 2004 to the present day. When we look at this process, it is clear that the source of the instruction behind Law No. 5199 is global elites.

 

Today, the government has become more sensitive to public reactions and has been forced to respond. On the other hand, the leaders of some small parties that emphasize their religious values, despite the Prophet's practice of culling stray dogs in Medina. Despite the Prophet's practice of culling stray dogs in Medina, they act as if they are Islamic scholars by claiming that "Islam forbids the culling of dogs". This may suggest that they too may be under the influence of global powers. "May Allah save them", and we can wish well for those who may have fallen into such misconceptions.

 

Celebrities, civil society organizations and different platforms opposing the culling of stray dogs in Turkey raise suspicions about the influence of international relations on this issue. This should be addressed as a national security issue.

 

While it is obvious that the increase in the number of stray stray dogs threatens the ecosystem with the damage they cause to humans and natural life and that the current legal regulations are insufficient to solve this problem, the fact that they are sensitive to animal rights is obvious.The fact that some individuals and organizations have foreign connections that can have an adverse impact on the state in international relations raises national security concerns due to their potential to create public opinion in line with the interests of the powers they are financed by.

 

Let's take a look at the art world, which nowadays has strange reactions like "put me/us to sleep first" or "over my dead body";

 

The art world is driven by countries that are economically and culturally dominant. Powerful countries such as the USA stand out as one of the main actors determining the direction of art. In the field of art, as in other fields, there is a process of reshaping under the influence of global elites. Globalization has a profound impact on the cultural identity and mission of art, transforming the ways in which works of art are produced, disseminated and perceived in line with the interests of global elites. An in-depth look at the tabloid news, sponsors, agencies and production companies of those who utter the aforementioned words can reveal these relationships. They can even be understood by looking at the symbolic hand gestures that convey messages in their stage shows at their concerts.

 

Now let's talk about media organizations and journalists;

 

Although media outlets appear to be controlled by partisan capital, they are in fact integrated into a global structure. Therefore, their ostensible bosses are vulnerable to this structure. One must be vigilant about journalists working on behalf of Western media. Those working on behalf of Germany should be even more vigilant. The existence of Germany as an independent state is questionable, because since 1945 Germany has been under the influence of the US in appearance and global elites in reality. The German state advances the interests of global elites on sensitive issues that could be detrimental to humanity. Especially during the planned pandemic, it strongly supported the WHO's "one health" mission. Especially those who work for the German media and claim to be against the globalists should never be believed.

 

As for Social Media;

 

We are in a period where the concepts of social media, activism and phenomenon are intertwined. So much so that influencers who organize events on social media and lead social movements have started to be referred to as professionals in this field. In fact, it is now reported in the media that this is a profession and that prominent figures in the US earn an annual income of 100 thousand dollars depending on their influence. In Turkey, however, this new profession is not yet fully recognized and people are not sure whether local influencers who are activists in the field are really doing this as a profession or are volunteers.

 

Back to the issue of parties;

 

In December 2022, at the CHP Economy Conference, Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu had a live link with Jeremy Rifkin, who said that global warming was caused by cattle flatulence. This move can be interpreted by some as Kılıçdaroğlu revealing his relationship with global powers. Jeremy Rifkin is an American economic and social theorist, author, speaker, political consultant and author of books on long-term economic sustainability plans that address the challenges of the economic crisis, energy security and the climate crisis in line with the views of global elites.

 

Özgür Özel's approach to the issue of stray dogs is not out of the ordinary. "Effective sterilization and shelters can be the solution, not putting them to sleep," he says, continuing to say the classical things instead of alternative ways. However, when it comes to the high costs and implementation process of these proposals, Özel seems to evade the issue with evasive statements instead of providing a clear road map.

 

Likewise, his intervention against two CHP mayors' attempts to remove Arabic shop signs on the grounds of "abuse of religion" may even reflect his consistent approach similar to the globalists' plans to weaken and destroy the Turkish language in Anatolia. Later, when there was discomfort within his party over these remarks, he emphasized that legal regulations should be followed and populism should be avoided in the removal of Arabic signs. This may confirm his publicly claimed stance in favor of the globalists.

 

This attitude of the so-called religious, nationalist and conservative parties, as well as the populist and other populist parties, who have taken on the defense of stray dogs that have started to make the streets narrow for the people of the country, may be a reason for us to question what kind of policies they are pursuing in general. This sudden protective interest in stray dogs instead of our people suggests that perhaps we should re-evaluate their approach to social problems and what and who might be behind their priorities.

 

The purpose of this article is not whether stray dogs should be culled or not. It aims to put it on Turkey's agenda and to question the background of the developments.

 

SADI ÖZGÜL

 

Guwuste.com
Arise and warn, and put a stop to evil

 

Do not forget to share if you like our article...